Comments on: Anonymous Not Welcomed

By: Bigfoot

Bigfoot — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:21:34 +0000

While i think the only person on this site that knows who i am is Grant I agree that anon posting isnt right. If you dont give name to what you say then you cannot be criticised or complimented for what you have posted or you are to afraid to submit under a name becuz although this is the internet you are still afraid of being chastized.

By: Grant

Grant — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:00:06 +0000

Gman…

I love you.

Come to Denver. We’ll go to Wynnkoop Micro, I’ll buy.

You’re too good to stay anon!

By: Gman

Gman — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:45:24 +0000

Personally I don’t care either way. When I first got into ministry people left anon notes and such - even one that had an AD for another Church position circled and said you might apply. I wanted to write back to anon and say “You might go to hell too”

But I didn’t. Then I went anon for sometime. Why because if people knew who I was or my connections well let’s just say some Butt kissing and that or some hate mail. Especially when I wrote things anon as “I hate Doug Fields” or “I hate Youth Pastors” to get people to think. And sometimes I need the anon to rant or yell, and then for me to want to cuss them out only to extend some grace. Well kudos to Anon and non-anon alike. Let’s drink together. Next time I’m buying.

By: Jerry

Jerry — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:00:36 +0000

New blog commentors often feel more comfortable being anonymous. While preventing anonymous comments filters out pot shots, it also filters out readers who don’t feel comfortable registering and publishing under their real name - even when they aren’t trying to avoid accountability.

So all you new blog readers, come on over to my blog and leave some comments.

By: kris

kris — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:29:46 +0000

word up!