<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fantasy Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/</link>
	<description>the randomness of a distracted existential tour guide.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: daveb</title>
		<link>http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-67025</link>
		<dc:creator>daveb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-67025</guid>
		<description>Manning for sure then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manning for sure then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-67022</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-67022</guid>
		<description>Sorry...

1 point per 10 yds/carry or receiving
1 point per 50 yds/passing
-2 for fumbles/INT
6 for touchdowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;</p>
<p>1 point per 10 yds/carry or receiving<br />
1 point per 50 yds/passing<br />
-2 for fumbles/INT<br />
6 for touchdowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveb</title>
		<link>http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-66796</link>
		<dc:creator>daveb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-66796</guid>
		<description>You didn't tell us about your league scoring so I'd lean towards Manning unless QBs get dinged for points in your league. It's a tough call...Peterson is a freak of nature!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t tell us about your league scoring so I&#8217;d lean towards Manning unless QBs get dinged for points in your league. It&#8217;s a tough call&#8230;Peterson is a freak of nature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Graham</title>
		<link>http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-66728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grantenglish.com/archives/2007/12/19/the-fantasy-conundrum/#comment-66728</guid>
		<description>Alright, since you twisted my arm, I'd go for Manning over Peterson. There are a lot of people out there saying that Peterson should be the number one pick next year, but I'm not sure I see it (BTW I own Peterson in two different leagues). Here's my logic: 

(1)Manning has been playing at a high level longer than Peterson has, there's less chance that this was a fluke season from him. 

(2) Peterson has had injury problems since college, he missed two games this year and split time in two others while they were being cautious with him. 

Because of those two things I'd take Manning.

-Jeff-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, since you twisted my arm, I&#8217;d go for Manning over Peterson. There are a lot of people out there saying that Peterson should be the number one pick next year, but I&#8217;m not sure I see it (BTW I own Peterson in two different leagues). Here&#8217;s my logic: </p>
<p>(1)Manning has been playing at a high level longer than Peterson has, there&#8217;s less chance that this was a fluke season from him. </p>
<p>(2) Peterson has had injury problems since college, he missed two games this year and split time in two others while they were being cautious with him. </p>
<p>Because of those two things I&#8217;d take Manning.</p>
<p>-Jeff-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
