Quick definition for my sanity – a paradigm shift is a change of thinking, change in doing things. Often it’s a big one – like moving from PC to Mac. (Had to get a cheap shot in there…)
I got to see one happen this week. A group of us were talking about leadership in the church. What does a spiritual leader look like? What is the starting point of a leader? Who can be one? How are they developed? Good questions that will take us some time to unpack and refine. One particular question provided the paradigm shift moment. What is the starting point of a spiritual leader? “They should be a believer of Jesus.”
I smirked a bit and asked permission to push back a little. So when did the disciples become believers? Could there be a scenario that we would walk alongside a non-believer for the purpose of developing them into a spiritual leader? There was a pause. Hadn’t thought about it like that. When put that way it’s completely different, isn’t it? Absolutely we would. We’d call it discipleship or evangelism or lifewalking but absolutely we’d walk with a non-believer on that journey. And the shift happened.
The actual discussion point isn’t what really got my attention in that moment. Seeing the shift happen in a non-combative atmosphere did. Often times a paradigm shift is threatening and combative. I don’t think it needs to be or even should be this way, but more often than not it plays out that way. Part of the reason is because I’m put in the place where I have to let go of something that has been secure for so long because I finally realized it’s either false or unhealthy or unproductive. Basically, I have to say – “I was wrong about this.”
But what made this shift different? A couple of things that I honestly wish I’d learned sooner…
1. There wasn’t an agenda being pushed. We were just talking. We weren’t trying to craft policy or start a program. There was no huge issue on the table we were working through, just talking about leadership with no agenda or program hanging in the balance. Why is this important? Because I think when there is an issue/agenda/program on the table, the bigger questions get lost in the scuffle to protect the issue.
2. There was a high level of trust around the table. This alone doesn’t make paradigm shifting easier…but it helps. The flip side is this – if there isn’t a high level of trust, the shift is almost impossible to make.
3. We had permission to push. Big principle here…if you don’t have permission to push back, do so at your own risk. In Little Rock, we had a tight, close pastoral team between Row, Mark S., and I. We banged on each other all the time. It was good. But we learned some painful lessons as we tried to expand the team and allow others into that arena. Not everyone wants to be pushed. And if you do push and they aren’t ready…they’ll push back in unhealthy, dangerous ways. Or they’ll leave in unhealthy ways. When that happens, it’s like trying to glue back together a vase that’s been busted into a million pieces.
So if you don’t have permission to push, do you just not push? Settle for status quo? That’s not a good option either. Eventually leaders push. They just do. They can’t NOT push. Good ones invest on the relational side first, keep asking permission, and then push.
4. It would have been okay for the shift not to happen…for now. This lesson has been the hardest to learn. Am I okay with God taking His time in the life of another person? I know I am with me. I love it when God takes his time with me and is patient. It’s frustrating when He treats everybody else that way. That means I have to wait on Him…and that’s not fun. If this person had walked away disagreeing, it would have been fine. There was no agenda/issue to be won or pushed. The world wasn’t going to end. Western Hills wasn’t going to implode.
Are there times when you have to push hard and force the issue? I’m sure there are but the older I get, those times seem to be far fewer than I thought when I was younger. It’s the Spirit’s job to change and transform people. Not mine. I don’t have to have the last word.